vessel, respondent user would pay applicant $1000 a day.
allow respondent user to use of ship for remainder of term.
for damages, claiming sum in excess of $1000 a day.
was fundamental breach of contract and limitation clause did not apply.
construction, held an exclusion clause to be inapplicable where there had been
fundamental breach, in present case was no reason to limit plain contractual
provision that damages for delay should be assessed in accordance with limitation